Increased passive investment = more difficult to be an individual stock picker?

The argument from Mike Green is the opposite of what I have heard before - "Increased passive investment = more difficult to be an individual stock picker."

If you take a look from 40 minutes into the interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON6U6IMn8GI), he starts debating this problem, which I understand as follows:

Despite its apparent simplicity, passive investing can have unintended consequences, especially when a large portion of the market is passively managed. Here's how:

  • Less Price Discovery: Price discovery is the process where supply and demand determine a security's fair price. With fewer active investors analyzing companies, passive funds might not react efficiently to new information impacting a company's value. Prices may not reflect true fundamentals.
  • Reduced Market Elasticity: Imagine a rubber band. A healthy market is elastic, meaning prices adjust smoothly to new information. If passive funds dominate, the market might become less elastic. Prices may become "stickier" and not adjust as readily, potentially leading to larger price swings later.
  • Difficulty for Active Managers: Actively managed funds aim to outperform the market by strategically selecting investments. If the market is mostly passively managed, there may be fewer investment opportunities for active managers to exploit, making it harder for them to beat the market.

Do you agree?

Here is the timestamps:
Timestamps: 0:00:00 Intro 0:06:49 The effect the growth of indexing has on markets 0:08:46 The XIV trade that strengthened your belief in this view 0:15:29 Beyond the XIV trade, the evidence we have that indicates this is a problem 0:19:07 How we know that index funds have less elastic demand than the counterfactual security holders in the absence of index funds 0:21:37 Why flows into a cap weighted index fund are different from flows into the aggregate of active, which holds the market 0:31:54 How much of an issue this is in markets outside of the US 0:33:46 How systematic firms like Dimensional and Avantis, that tilt away from cap weights, fit into these dynamics 0:40:55 How the issue created by index fund ownership is distinct from market efficiency 0:46:55 How investors should change their strategy in response to the current market structure 0:53:54 As a portfolio manager, how Mike incorporates his views on passive into investment strategies 0:59:20 Whose responsibility it is to fix these market structure problems 1:05:39 Separate from the index fund effects, what Mike's outlook on US equity expected returns is 1:09:04 Why Bitcoin isn’t the solution to all monetary and fiscal policy problems 1:12:50 Mike Defines Success in His Life

3 Likes

Taking some time to view and think about the presentation I find the argument creditable. It looks like the classic calculus word problem with a tank, flows in and out, and one needs to figure out when the fluid drains out (or overflows). The fluid here is the available float. He argues that the price insensitive nature of the index funds is locking up more and more of the float making it unavailable to others using different selection methods.

I pretty much agree with the first two bullets. The second may or may not hold depending on the style employed with a relative style likely holding up longer than an absolute style. That is until there is no available float as he describes in his endgame.

Cheers.

Rich

1 Like