New book "Evidence-Based Technical Analysis"

I’ve discovered an interesting looking new book on Amazon. Just ordered it today.

“Evidence-Based Technical Analysis: Applying the Scientific Method and Statistical Inference to Trading Signals”
By Prof. David Aronson

I hope it’s not a boring tome, so far the reviews are excellent.

Here is the book description:

“Evidence-Based Technical Analysis is a breakthrough book in that it rigorously applies the scientific method and recently developed statistical tests to determine the true effectiveness of trading strategies, rules or systems discovered by data mining. Traditional technical analysis – as currently practiced – is more like a faith-based folk art than a science, the author asserts. These subjective interpretive methods cannot be back-tested or evaluated, yet many believe that they are effective. The author explains that because of various cognitive biases and illusions, such as hindsight bias, illusory correlations, etc., people often adopt beliefs that are unsupported by evidence or even contradicted by evidence. For example, the famous head and shoulders pattern – a cornerstone of traditional TA when tested objectively – has been shown to have no predictive power. Yet many TA texts and most TA experts believe in the pattern’s efficacy. To move technical analysis forward, the author proposes a new type of technical analysis, which he calls: evidence-based technical analysis or EBTA. Unlike traditional technical analysis, EBTA is restricted to objective methods whose historical profitability can be quantified and then rigorously scrutinized. The author provides a new statistical methodology specifically designed for evaluating the performance of rules that are discovered by data mining, a process in which many rules are back-tested and the best performing rule(s) is selected. Experimental results presented in the book show that data mining is an effective approach for discovering useful rules. However, the historical performance of the best rule (s) is upwardly biased - a combined effect of randomness and data mining. Thus new statistical tests are needed to make reasonable inferences about the future profitability of rules discovered by data mining. Most importantly, in a data mining case study the author evaluates more than 6,400 signaling rules applied to the S&P500 Index using these new tests. For technical analysts and traders, the book is a wake-up call to abandon subjective, interpretive methods and embrace an approach that is scientifically and statistically valid. For other traders, the rigorous testing of trading signals/rules may make their data mining efforts more productive and stimulate the development of new systems, signaling rules.”

Stu

Stumo,
thanks for the interersting book hint.

Have you read the book? If yes, can you or somebody else give some highlights or soundbites on how to practically apply this new knowledge?

Thanks.

Werner

There is a web-site associated with the book,

http://www.evidencebasedta.com/

which has one downloadable, somewhat mathematical, .pdf companion article which discusses at some length concerns associated with data mining when testing technically-based trading systems.

http://www.evidencebasedta.com/MonteDoc12.15.06.pdf

The article’s conclusion points to Monte-Carlo as being among the somewhat more useful tests of technical trading systems, eg: " Monte-Carlo permutation tests tend to be more robust than most other tests" ,

The author also cautions that one must be rather careful against data-mining bias even with Monte Carlo analysis of trading systems.

Kurt

great book, a little too long though.

also great is ken fishers new book.