Hi Everyone, new user here.
Apologies in advance for the newbie question. I’d like to test lower asset growth relative to sales as a long factor, but I need to avoid negative sales and huge percent changes off of small bases. I am assuming this alone will not work: (lower is better) AstTotGr%3Y/ SalesGr%3Y.
If you prefer assets that are shrinking and sales that are growing, then a positive change in asset turnover (sales/assets) would be what you’re looking for. AstTurnGr%3Y (higher better) might do the trick. If not, let me know and I’ll ponder further.
I mainly want to avoid excessive asset growth on its own. Related question - is there a way to rank for organic, not acquired growth when ranking/screening on sales growth?
For avoiding asset growth on its own, you could just use AstTotGr%3Y, lower better. For organic sales growth, you might want to use Gr% (SalesA - 3 * Acquis3Yavg, Sales (3, Ann), 3)
. Of course, that assumes that the price of the acquisition was one years’ worth of sales. Another option would be to screen out companies whose Acquis3YAvg is above a certain percentage of AstTot3YAvg.
Thank you, Yuval.