Marc,
This is an interesting approach! Are we at a bottom now, or is there a ways down to go?
I wanted to test this idea by seeing how it would have performed back in the ‘01 and ’02 Bear market. In other words, what would have happened if we had used this approach starting 3 months before the first of that market’s triple bottom? What happens if instead we wait until 6 months later to buy, or 6 months after that? When would this approach have worked, and by how much?
So I copied your Ranking System and developed a Screener that duplicated your 10 stock list. Since we don’t have a “Retail” sector to use as a universe it was a little difficult to determine which industries you used. There are 8 industries in the retail list, but by using 4 of them I was able to reproduce your list and in the same order. I used the following Screener filter rules:
MktCap > 100
Industry = RTAPRL or Industry = RTDEPT or Industry = RTFOOD or Industry = RTNONA
I set the Universe to; No OTC Exchange, and the Benchmark to; Russell 2000.
Assume that we bought the top stocks in mid April, three months before the first market bottom on 07/15/02, and held them for 1 year. I ran the Ranking System Performance of your system using my above screen starting on 04/13/02 through 04/19/03 using 1 year rebalance, and 15 buckets (there were only 153 stocks that passed the Screener on 04/13/02). I got -18.5% annual return (Ouch!), about the same as the Russell 2000 at -17.7% over the same time period. I re-ran it rebalancing every 4 weeks and got -9.2%, a lot better.
I then repeated the test starting 6 months latter on 10/12/02 and I got +50.5% (Now we’re talking!) while the Russell 2000 got +52.7% (oh, about the same). Rebalancing every 4 weeks achieved +42.6%.
I repeated it starting on 04/12/03 (1 month after the 3rd bottom) and I got +81.9% (that’s pretty darn good for a bunch of retail companies) compared to the Russell 2000 +57.1%. Rebalancing every 4 weeks achieved +69.4%.
I then ran it over the 2 years from 04/13/02 to 04/17/04 rebalancing every 4 weeks and I got a +21.7% annual return while the Russell 2000 achieved +15.9% over the same 2 years.
Bottom line: If we pick the right time to start and hold for 1 year we can significantly outperform the Russell 2000. If we start at the wrong time we will do about the same as the index. If we rebalance monthly we might be able to outperform the index in down markets, but under perform in some up markets.
So, what do we do now?
Denny 