An industry performance rule was also added that limits results to stock of companies whose industries ranked in the top 20% when it comes to 13 week average share price performance
One new sell rule was also added:
It forces the model to exit a stock that closes below the 90-day Chaikin Trend indicator and the 90-day Chaikin indicator is lower than where it was the prior day.
It uses the Russel 2000 universe which should not have any liquidity issues. Feel free to run a sim using liquidity filters to see if it makes a difference and let us know.
If you start off with a few millions, some liquidity filters are probably necessary.
What am I missing? The stats page of this portfolio shows a YTD return of 5.16%, while the “performance by calendar year” show return in 2010 to be 0.61%.
Worse yet, the YTD performance in the weekly performance email shows 1 year performance to be 51.77%. When I rerun the portfolio for 1 year (as a simulation ending 7/30/10) the return is only 1.05%
Performance
Return Model S&P 500
Total 4,024.49 % -3.86 %
Annualized 48.98 % -0.42 %
Year To Date 5.16 % -1.21 %
4 Week 19.37 % 7.73 %
13 Week -3.52 % -7.17 %
1 Year 51.77 % 11.64 %
3 Year 213.04 % -24.30 %
The 5.16% YTD is correct. The 0.61% for 2010 in the Performance->Stats I’d have to investigate. It is a different logic (annualized), but it does seem to be off.
Running a 1Y sim is not the same. 1Y ago the port had running positions that were obviously different than starting a sim 1Y ago: they were bought in previous rebalances, and held on. It is a big difference, but with only 10 positions a couple of differences can compound dramatically.
It’s no longer a Portfolio123 strategy, but there are a number of public versions you can play with. Click on Research, then Research search, then put “Chaikin” in the “model name” field and you’ll see them.